Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Soapbox

Apollo Creed

New Apollo Energy Act contrasts sharply with "Jurassic" GOP energy bill

By Jay Inslee
18 May 2005
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
On April 21, Congress stepped back in geologic time when the House of Representatives passed an energy policy of the dinosaurs, by the dinosaurs, and for the dinosaurs. This energy bill is truly a "Jurassic" piece of legislation that relies on a limited energy source derived from creatures and plants that died millions of years ago. In fact, 93 percent of the $8 billion in tax incentives in the bill go to oil, gas, and other traditional energy industries.

U.S. flag and wind turbine
A patriotic sight.
Photo: Tennessee Valley Infrastructure Group Inc. c/o NREL.
Shortly before the House debate, one national leader said, "I will tell you with $55 oil we don't need incentives to oil and gas companies to explore. ... What we need is to put a strategy in place that will help this country over time become less dependent." Incredibly, that leader was President George W. Bush. Even the president with the worst environmental record since Warren G. Harding cannot conceal that this energy bill is more technologically suited for the 19th century than the 21st century.

Instead of this petroleum-soaked energy policy, some of my colleagues and I have been promoting a new vision for our energy future, one that would avoid drilling in our pristine areas, while creating jobs, enhancing our national security, and protecting the environment. This clean-energy vision, called the New Apollo Energy Act, is based on optimism rather than self-doubt, on new technologies rather than archaic methods, and on faith in Americans' innovative talent rather than capitulation to narrow special interests. New Apollo will commit our nation to clean energy to increase domestic high-tech employment, reduce the effects of climate change, and advance our country toward independence from foreign oil. Though the Republican leadership refused to allow us to offer a version of New Apollo as an amendment to the energy bill, I will soon be introducing it as a separate bill in Congress.

New Apollo draws its inspiration from President Kennedy's original "Apollo" plan, which in 1961 challenged the nation to put a man on the moon within the decade and return him safely to Earth. Kennedy recognized that Americans love a good challenge and are the most creative people in human history. In a similar way, New Apollo challenges Americans to harness their legendary ingenuity and technological prowess to build a clean, economically beneficial energy system on our own planet -- a planet we want to keep comfortably fit for human habitation and free from global warming and conflicts arising over the control of petroleum.

Our New Apollo Energy Act will provide $49 billion in government loan guarantees for the construction of clean-energy generation facilities that will produce power from wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, oceans, coal with carbon-sequestration technology, and other sources. The legislation will also commit $10.5 billion to research-and-development investment tax credits for clean energy-producing operations. In addition, it includes a 10-year extension of the current credit for electricity generated from clean sources. Making these clean energy sources cost-effective for citizens will require this type of bold infrastructure investment by the federal government.

There is no one silver bullet that will solve the nation's energy crisis, so New Apollo pursues a number of other strategies as well. It creates national net-metering and interconnection standards that allow homeowners who generate clean energy to reduce their energy bills by feeding surplus electricity back into the grid. It also contains a renewable portfolio standard that will require all utilities to produce 10 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2021.

Of course, the best way to generate energy is to not waste it, so New Apollo includes incentives for American consumers to drive fuel-efficient vehicles, including tax credits for the purchase of hybrid, alternative-fuel, low-emission advanced diesel, and fuel-cell vehicles. It also provides an incentive program to encourage domestic automotive and aerospace manufacturers to develop new fuel-efficient automobiles and planes.

These boosts for clean energy and efficiency will make it possible to meet our bill's call for notable reductions in daily domestic oil consumption -- cuts of 600,000 barrels a day by 2010, 1,700,000 barrels by 2015, and 3,000,000 barrels by 2020. These numbers are approximate estimates of the amount of oil the United States would soon be importing daily from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the entire Middle East, respectively, without a change in current policy. Lessening our dependence on foreign oil will greatly strengthen our national security.

That is in sharp contrast to what we would see under the Republicans' Jurassic energy bill -- an 80 percent increase in petroleum imports between 2002 and 2025, according to the president's own Energy Department. That bill fails to recognize that the United States has only 3 percent of the world's petroleum reserves but consumes 25 percent of the world's oil -- simply put, we cannot drill our way to energy independence. Even with the most generous estimates, opening up the Arctic Refuge and other treasures for exploration would not have any significant impact on oil supply or prices.

A smart energy policy must also address the threats posed by global warming. Scientists have found overwhelming evidence that climate change is caused by rising greenhouse-gas levels in the atmosphere, driven largely by the burning of fossil fuels. The argument is over -- debating global warming is as sensible as debating gravity. New Apollo would enact a proposal similar to the McCain-Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act by capping our emissions of greenhouse gases while allowing companies to purchase and trade credits amongst themselves to ensure the most cost-effective reductions, and funding research to help industries make the shift to cleaner operations. The bill targets one of the biggest greenhouse-gas offenders -- coal -- by providing $7 billion for the development of energy-efficient coal-fired power plants that sequester 90 percent of their carbon-dioxide emissions.

Allowing America's clean-energy industries to stagnate is economically dangerous. While the U.S. has remained fixated on oil and gas, Denmark, Germany, and Japan have surpassed our country in reaping the economic benefits of renewable-energy technologies. Non-U.S. companies now produce about 90 percent of solar photovoltaic panels, with Japanese firms alone controlling about 49 percent of the solar-technology market -- technology that Americans originally developed. European companies control 85 percent of wind-turbine manufacturing, and the U.S. currently imports fuel cells from Canada. New Apollo will close this technology gap with foreign competitors by investing billions of dollars in new federal research into advanced clean technologies, and creating a government-funded risk pool to help struggling start-up clean-energy companies commercialize their products.

America's high-tech hubs like the Puget Sound area, which includes my home district, will significantly benefit from investment in clean energy. One study by the Apollo Alliance has found that a substantial federal commitment to clean energy could yield up to 3.3 million jobs nationally.

There is a sad irony in the fact that humans are now relying on energy from fossilized dinosaurs and vegetation, which died most likely as a result of climate change, to such a great extent that we are altering the nature of our own atmosphere. But we can change our path through optimism and ingenuity -- our country has a history of taking on tough challenges and triumphing. It is now time to roll up our sleeves, get down to work, and lead the world in developing new energy technologies through a New Apollo Energy Act.


This piece reflects the opinion of its author and should not be taken to constitute an official endorsement by Grist Magazine, its staff, its board, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians.

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
U.S. Rep. Jay Inslee (D) represents Washington state's First Congressional District. Learn more about the New Apollo Energy Act at his website.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (7 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Relation to Apollo Alliance

Is Rep. Inslee's proposed bill related to the work being done by the Apollo Alliance?  (http://www.apolloalliance.org)

Government purchase of green energy products.

I am surprised that this proposal does not include purchase of wind, solar, hybrid plugin vehicles, and biofuel for federal, state, and local government use.

Government vehicles are replaced  as they age, why not negotiate large orders of hybrid plugin vehicles with US automakers for this purpose?  Orders that allow wholesale pricing and economies of scale to equalize purchase prices of this oil and money saving technology with regular vehicles.

And incentives for local and state governments to favor these purchases with federal rebates...similar to the rebates that auto makers use to drive sales.

With an upgrade and extension of the national power grid, government could also invest in wind and solar powered electricity to heat and cool it's facilities.  Offices, military bases, schools...these needs amount to a signifigant portion of the energy used in the US. And could also foster economies of scale with large orders for this equipment.

Mass production and installation will bring the price down and allow these systems to compete.  

If conventional automotive powerplants and utility generating equipment were produced as wind, solar, biofuel, and plugin hybrids are now, one at a time or at very low production levels,...we would most likely still be riding horses and driving buggies.

There are already long waiting lists for Toyota's hybrid vehicles, even though their added initial cost at present fuel prices provides a limited incentive.  Buyers are betting that fuel prices will rise at a rate well above the rate of inflation.

This plan seems to have more political hype to it than actual funding and practical goals.  Were a similat approach taken in the original Apollo Project, Russia would have beaten US to the moon.

10 billion over 10 years is a more reasonable rate of investment of tax dollars given the cost of these oil wars, which is fast approaching the level of 200 billion dollars per year.

Over 500 million dollars per day is now spent on imported oil by US consumers.  Add another 500 million per day for oil wars...and that's over a billion per day, because we are dependent on imported oil.

10 billion dollars per year for 10 years would fund the upgrade and extension of the national power grid to allow local power companies to invest in wind and solar power plants in areas that have an abundance of clean energy, like the high wind speed areas of the great plains, and the sunny desert southwest.

And it would allow government to foster the manufacture of solar, wind, hybrid vehicles, and biofuel plants to meet it's own energy needs.  As in WW 2 war production, government working with industry could win these oil wars.

But this time with 10s of thousands of wind, solar, and biofuel plants and millions of hybrid plugin vehicles...instead of millions of jeeps, trucks, planes, ships, guns, bombs...

American workers and factories could do it all again and the US manufacturing and tax base would be revitalized, providing good jobs once again for american families.  The US would become an export leader of these oil and earth saving products.

It's time for progressive politicians to throw caution to the wind (and sun) and take a chance.  We are rapidly losing political power to the corporate shills, the neo-conservatives are planning never ending oil wars for global corporate empire.  And their WMD and other lies are winning votes.

There is no faithbased patriotism  required to see that this new energy policy is truly patriotic, unlike these eternal oil wars and the terrorism that comes with them.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

re relation to Apollo Alliance

Apollo Alliance folks and Rep. Inslee coincidentally began working on the same idea, independently and at roughly the same time, using the exact same moniker (Apollo).  The Apollo Alliance people came to us before getting their alliance off the ground when they found an op ed Inslee had published in the Seattle PI on the subject from December of '02 (http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/100516_inslee19.shtml?searchpagefrom=1&searchdiff=883).  We have worked with the Apollo Alliance, as well as many other organizations and clean energy industry experts in developing some of these ideas and concepts.  

Brian Bonlender
Legislative Director
Office of Congressman Jay Inslee

Government purchase of green energy products

It seems that we both agree on the same goals here.  Regarding the agressiveness of this bill, it is far more agressive than anything else put forward.  It is truly a crash effort to deal with our energy situation.

Rargarding your first specific concern, here's what it does to have the federal gov use its buying power:

-Requires the federal government to purchase 10% of its electricity from renewable sources, such as solar and wind power, or other zero-emission sources by 2015.

-Require that when the federal government purchases vehicles, 10% of those vehicles must be hybrids or vehicles that otherwise achieve 40 miles per gallon.

-Provides interest free loans so that institutions of higher learning, municipalities and local governments can purchase hybrids or vehicles that can get 40 miles to the gallon.

-Require the government to, where it is economically feasible, purchase biodiesel, 85% ethanol blended gasoline, or 10% ethanol blended gasoline.

- The bill will also provide tax credits in order to incentivize consumer purchase of and industry production of hybrids, advanced diesels, alternative fuel and hydrogen vehicles.

Brian Bonlender
Legislative Director
Congressman Jay Inslee


Re: Brian Bonlender

Thanks for responding.  My plan is the negotiating position of we the people, for want of any other.  

It is number 12 with a bullet in ratings on the moveon.org forum out of over 5000 comments.

The Bush energy plan is the corporate neo-conservative energy monopoly negotiating position.

So you come down in the middle?  With only 10% purchase by government of green energy, and by 2015?

That is not the middle.  Go back to your corporate donors and tell them to give US more.

We the people need an energy plan that eliminates imported oil by 2015, and ends these oil wars once and for all.  This is as important as WW 2 war production was.

Get serious about it!                thanks!  

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

Re: Re: Brian Bonlender

Amazingdrx the trick is to get the bill passed first and then change the numbers later. A 50% requirement on the govt wouldn't even need Delay to twist arms to shoot it down.

Re: "then change the numbers later"

Ahh riiight.  It won't be like the other measures on the environment by bushco inc., like the clean air act.

Once it is passed the numbers will be changed to really help get green energy going.  

And the McCain/Lieberman nuke cue lar power provision in that energy bill will be dropped too.

We'll fool them right? Hehey.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
The Battle of All Mothers, by Angela Park. Are greens overlooking a key constituency?
Let's Talk About Climate Change, by Ian McEwan. To address global warming, we must harness rationality, good science, and enlightened globalization.
Imagine That, by Bill McKibben. What the warming world needs now is art, sweet art.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks